EDELWEISS vs WELSPUNLIV: Stock Comparison

Head-to-head financial and trading comparison between Edelweiss Financial Services Limited (EDELWEISS) and Welspun Living Limited (WELSPUNLIV) in the Cross-Sector Peers sector.

EDELWEISS

NSE: EDELWEISS
Edelweiss Financial Services Limited
₹127.89
1Y Return: +8.98%
52W High: ₹142.73
52W Low: ₹105.46
Annual Volatility: 45.15%
Check EDELWEISS Trade Fees →

WELSPUNLIV

NSE: WELSPUNLIV
Welspun Living Limited
₹223.75
1Y Return: +76.31%
52W High: ₹239.17
52W Low: ₹126.91
Annual Volatility: 35.87%
Check WELSPUNLIV Trade Fees →

Key Metrics Comparison Table

MetricEDELWEISSWELSPUNLIVEdge / Winner
Current Market Price (CMP) ₹127.89 ₹223.75 —
1-Year Price Return +8.98% +76.31% WELSPUNLIV (67.33% higher)
52-Week High ₹142.73 ₹239.17 —
52-Week Low ₹105.46 ₹126.91 —
30-Day Annualized Volatility 45.15% 35.87% WELSPUNLIV (Steadier)
30-Day Average Daily Volume 8,653,392 4,900,919 EDELWEISS (Higher Liquidity)
Statutory Cost to Trade ₹1 Lakh ₹118.50 ₹118.50 Identical statutory tariff

Frequently Asked Questions

Between EDELWEISS and WELSPUNLIV, which stock gave better returns over the last year?

WELSPUNLIV has outperformed EDELWEISS over the past 12 months with a gain of 76.31% compared to 8.98%.

Which stock is less volatile: EDELWEISS or WELSPUNLIV?

WELSPUNLIV demonstrated lower price volatility (35.87% annualized) compared to EDELWEISS (45.15%). Lower volatility generally indicates steadier price action during market downturns.

What is the statutory cost to buy ₹1,00,000 of EDELWEISS vs WELSPUNLIV?

Statutory exchange and government charges (STT, NSE turnover fees, SEBI fee, Stamp duty, and GST) are identical for delivery purchases of equal rupee value across both stocks, totaling approximately ₹118.50 on discount brokers offering zero delivery brokerage (like Zerodha or Dhan).

Are EDELWEISS and WELSPUNLIV direct sector competitors?

Yes, both companies operate within the Cross-Sector Peers sector in India and are actively tracked as sector peers by institutional and retail market participants.