GOLDIETF vs UCOBANK: Stock Comparison

Head-to-head financial and trading comparison between GOLDIETF (GOLDIETF) and UCO Bank (UCOBANK) in the Cross-Sector Peers sector.

GOLDIETF

NSE: GOLDIETF
GOLDIETF
₹127.35
1Y Return: -1.63%
52W High: ₹137.71
52W Low: ₹118.55
Annual Volatility: 18.93%
Check GOLDIETF Trade Fees →

UCOBANK

NSE: UCOBANK
UCO Bank
₹23.25
1Y Return: -12.26%
52W High: ₹28.20
52W Low: ₹22.93
Annual Volatility: 17.5%
Check UCOBANK Trade Fees →

Key Metrics Comparison Table

MetricGOLDIETFUCOBANKEdge / Winner
Current Market Price (CMP) ₹127.35 ₹23.25 —
1-Year Price Return -1.63% -12.26% GOLDIETF (10.63% higher)
52-Week High ₹137.71 ₹28.20 —
52-Week Low ₹118.55 ₹22.93 —
30-Day Annualized Volatility 18.93% 17.5% UCOBANK (Steadier)
30-Day Average Daily Volume 6,137,682 3,928,262 GOLDIETF (Higher Liquidity)
Statutory Cost to Trade ₹1 Lakh ₹118.50 ₹118.50 Identical statutory tariff

Frequently Asked Questions

Between GOLDIETF and UCOBANK, which stock gave better returns over the last year?

GOLDIETF has outperformed UCOBANK over the past 12 months with a gain of -1.63% compared to -12.26%.

Which stock is less volatile: GOLDIETF or UCOBANK?

UCOBANK demonstrated lower price volatility (17.5% annualized) compared to GOLDIETF (18.93%). Lower volatility generally indicates steadier price action during market downturns.

What is the statutory cost to buy ₹1,00,000 of GOLDIETF vs UCOBANK?

Statutory exchange and government charges (STT, NSE turnover fees, SEBI fee, Stamp duty, and GST) are identical for delivery purchases of equal rupee value across both stocks, totaling approximately ₹118.50 on discount brokers offering zero delivery brokerage (like Zerodha or Dhan).

Are GOLDIETF and UCOBANK direct sector competitors?

Yes, both companies operate within the Cross-Sector Peers sector in India and are actively tracked as sector peers by institutional and retail market participants.