KALYANKJIL vs LOTUSDEV: Stock Comparison

Head-to-head financial and trading comparison between Kalyan Jewellers India Limited (KALYANKJIL) and Sri Lotus Developers and Realty Limited (LOTUSDEV) in the Cross-Sector Peers sector.

KALYANKJIL

NSE: KALYANKJIL
Kalyan Jewellers India Limited
₹554.00
1Y Return: +32.69%
52W High: ₹634.60
52W Low: ₹330.80
Annual Volatility: 38.08%
Check KALYANKJIL Trade Fees →

LOTUSDEV

NSE: LOTUSDEV
Sri Lotus Developers and Realty Limited
₹176.54
1Y Return: +21.52%
52W High: ₹200.12
52W Low: ₹129.27
Annual Volatility: 51.08%
Check LOTUSDEV Trade Fees →

Key Metrics Comparison Table

MetricKALYANKJILLOTUSDEVEdge / Winner
Current Market Price (CMP) ₹554.00 ₹176.54 —
1-Year Price Return +32.69% +21.52% KALYANKJIL (11.17% higher)
52-Week High ₹634.60 ₹200.12 —
52-Week Low ₹330.80 ₹129.27 —
30-Day Annualized Volatility 38.08% 51.08% KALYANKJIL (Steadier)
30-Day Average Daily Volume 7,971,775 3,959,983 KALYANKJIL (Higher Liquidity)
Statutory Cost to Trade ₹1 Lakh ₹118.50 ₹118.50 Identical statutory tariff

Frequently Asked Questions

Between KALYANKJIL and LOTUSDEV, which stock gave better returns over the last year?

KALYANKJIL has outperformed LOTUSDEV over the past 12 months with a gain of 32.69% compared to 21.52%.

Which stock is less volatile: KALYANKJIL or LOTUSDEV?

KALYANKJIL demonstrated lower price volatility (38.08% annualized) compared to LOTUSDEV (51.08%). Lower volatility generally indicates steadier price action during market downturns.

What is the statutory cost to buy ₹1,00,000 of KALYANKJIL vs LOTUSDEV?

Statutory exchange and government charges (STT, NSE turnover fees, SEBI fee, Stamp duty, and GST) are identical for delivery purchases of equal rupee value across both stocks, totaling approximately ₹118.50 on discount brokers offering zero delivery brokerage (like Zerodha or Dhan).

Are KALYANKJIL and LOTUSDEV direct sector competitors?

Yes, both companies operate within the Cross-Sector Peers sector in India and are actively tracked as sector peers by institutional and retail market participants.