LLOYDSENGG vs SHUKRAPHAR: Stock Comparison

Head-to-head financial and trading comparison between LLOYDS ENGINEERING WORKS LIMITED (LLOYDSENGG) and Shukra Pharmaceuticals Limited (SHUKRAPHAR) in the Cross-Sector Peers sector.

LLOYDSENGG

NSE: LLOYDSENGG
LLOYDS ENGINEERING WORKS LIMITED
₹94.42
1Y Return: +70.03%
52W High: ₹102.20
52W Low: ₹55.53
Annual Volatility: 49.51%
Check LLOYDSENGG Trade Fees →

SHUKRAPHAR

NSE: SHUKRAPHAR
Shukra Pharmaceuticals Limited
₹66.94
1Y Return: +61.61%
52W High: ₹72.58
52W Low: ₹41.42
Annual Volatility: 64.68%
Check SHUKRAPHAR Trade Fees →

Key Metrics Comparison Table

MetricLLOYDSENGGSHUKRAPHAREdge / Winner
Current Market Price (CMP) ₹94.42 ₹66.94 —
1-Year Price Return +70.03% +61.61% LLOYDSENGG (8.42% higher)
52-Week High ₹102.20 ₹72.58 —
52-Week Low ₹55.53 ₹41.42 —
30-Day Annualized Volatility 49.51% 64.68% LLOYDSENGG (Steadier)
30-Day Average Daily Volume 11,398,857 6,592,919 LLOYDSENGG (Higher Liquidity)
Statutory Cost to Trade ₹1 Lakh ₹118.50 ₹118.50 Identical statutory tariff

Frequently Asked Questions

Between LLOYDSENGG and SHUKRAPHAR, which stock gave better returns over the last year?

LLOYDSENGG has outperformed SHUKRAPHAR over the past 12 months with a gain of 70.03% compared to 61.61%.

Which stock is less volatile: LLOYDSENGG or SHUKRAPHAR?

LLOYDSENGG demonstrated lower price volatility (49.51% annualized) compared to SHUKRAPHAR (64.68%). Lower volatility generally indicates steadier price action during market downturns.

What is the statutory cost to buy ₹1,00,000 of LLOYDSENGG vs SHUKRAPHAR?

Statutory exchange and government charges (STT, NSE turnover fees, SEBI fee, Stamp duty, and GST) are identical for delivery purchases of equal rupee value across both stocks, totaling approximately ₹118.50 on discount brokers offering zero delivery brokerage (like Zerodha or Dhan).

Are LLOYDSENGG and SHUKRAPHAR direct sector competitors?

Yes, both companies operate within the Cross-Sector Peers sector in India and are actively tracked as sector peers by institutional and retail market participants.