LLOYDSENGG vs TDPOWERSYS: Stock Comparison

Head-to-head financial and trading comparison between LLOYDS ENGINEERING WORKS LIMITED (LLOYDSENGG) and TD Power Systems Limited (TDPOWERSYS) in the Cross-Sector Peers sector.

LLOYDSENGG

NSE: LLOYDSENGG
LLOYDS ENGINEERING WORKS LIMITED
₹94.42
1Y Return: +70.03%
52W High: ₹102.20
52W Low: ₹55.53
Annual Volatility: 49.51%
Check LLOYDSENGG Trade Fees →

TDPOWERSYS

NSE: TDPOWERSYS
TD Power Systems Limited
₹793.75
1Y Return: -22.99%
52W High: ₹1,586.60
52W Low: ₹696.00
Annual Volatility: 56.44%
Check TDPOWERSYS Trade Fees →

Key Metrics Comparison Table

MetricLLOYDSENGGTDPOWERSYSEdge / Winner
Current Market Price (CMP) ₹94.42 ₹793.75 —
1-Year Price Return +70.03% -22.99% LLOYDSENGG (93.02% higher)
52-Week High ₹102.20 ₹1,586.60 —
52-Week Low ₹55.53 ₹696.00 —
30-Day Annualized Volatility 49.51% 56.44% LLOYDSENGG (Steadier)
30-Day Average Daily Volume 11,398,857 2,852,428 LLOYDSENGG (Higher Liquidity)
Statutory Cost to Trade ₹1 Lakh ₹118.50 ₹118.50 Identical statutory tariff

Frequently Asked Questions

Between LLOYDSENGG and TDPOWERSYS, which stock gave better returns over the last year?

LLOYDSENGG has outperformed TDPOWERSYS over the past 12 months with a gain of 70.03% compared to -22.99%.

Which stock is less volatile: LLOYDSENGG or TDPOWERSYS?

LLOYDSENGG demonstrated lower price volatility (49.51% annualized) compared to TDPOWERSYS (56.44%). Lower volatility generally indicates steadier price action during market downturns.

What is the statutory cost to buy ₹1,00,000 of LLOYDSENGG vs TDPOWERSYS?

Statutory exchange and government charges (STT, NSE turnover fees, SEBI fee, Stamp duty, and GST) are identical for delivery purchases of equal rupee value across both stocks, totaling approximately ₹118.50 on discount brokers offering zero delivery brokerage (like Zerodha or Dhan).

Are LLOYDSENGG and TDPOWERSYS direct sector competitors?

Yes, both companies operate within the Cross-Sector Peers sector in India and are actively tracked as sector peers by institutional and retail market participants.