LLOYDSENGG vs WEBELSOLAR: Stock Comparison

Head-to-head financial and trading comparison between LLOYDS ENGINEERING WORKS LIMITED (LLOYDSENGG) and Websol Energy System Limited (WEBELSOLAR) in the Cross-Sector Peers sector.

LLOYDSENGG

NSE: LLOYDSENGG
LLOYDS ENGINEERING WORKS LIMITED
₹94.42
1Y Return: +70.03%
52W High: ₹102.20
52W Low: ₹55.53
Annual Volatility: 49.51%
Check LLOYDSENGG Trade Fees →

WEBELSOLAR

NSE: WEBELSOLAR
Websol Energy System Limited
₹65.57
1Y Return: -25.96%
52W High: ₹122.20
52W Low: ₹65.57
Annual Volatility: 37.35%
Check WEBELSOLAR Trade Fees →

Key Metrics Comparison Table

MetricLLOYDSENGGWEBELSOLAREdge / Winner
Current Market Price (CMP) ₹94.42 ₹65.57 —
1-Year Price Return +70.03% -25.96% LLOYDSENGG (95.99% higher)
52-Week High ₹102.20 ₹122.20 —
52-Week Low ₹55.53 ₹65.57 —
30-Day Annualized Volatility 49.51% 37.35% WEBELSOLAR (Steadier)
30-Day Average Daily Volume 11,398,857 1,958,441 LLOYDSENGG (Higher Liquidity)
Statutory Cost to Trade ₹1 Lakh ₹118.50 ₹118.50 Identical statutory tariff

Frequently Asked Questions

Between LLOYDSENGG and WEBELSOLAR, which stock gave better returns over the last year?

LLOYDSENGG has outperformed WEBELSOLAR over the past 12 months with a gain of 70.03% compared to -25.96%.

Which stock is less volatile: LLOYDSENGG or WEBELSOLAR?

WEBELSOLAR demonstrated lower price volatility (37.35% annualized) compared to LLOYDSENGG (49.51%). Lower volatility generally indicates steadier price action during market downturns.

What is the statutory cost to buy ₹1,00,000 of LLOYDSENGG vs WEBELSOLAR?

Statutory exchange and government charges (STT, NSE turnover fees, SEBI fee, Stamp duty, and GST) are identical for delivery purchases of equal rupee value across both stocks, totaling approximately ₹118.50 on discount brokers offering zero delivery brokerage (like Zerodha or Dhan).

Are LLOYDSENGG and WEBELSOLAR direct sector competitors?

Yes, both companies operate within the Cross-Sector Peers sector in India and are actively tracked as sector peers by institutional and retail market participants.