PARACABLES vs EQUITASBNK: Stock Comparison

Head-to-head financial and trading comparison between Paramount Communications Limited (PARACABLES) and Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited (EQUITASBNK) in the Cross-Sector Peers sector.

PARACABLES

NSE: PARACABLES
Paramount Communications Limited
₹55.85
1Y Return: +44.76%
52W High: ₹74.13
52W Low: ₹36.75
Annual Volatility: 45.82%
Check PARACABLES Trade Fees →

EQUITASBNK

NSE: EQUITASBNK
Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited
₹66.02
1Y Return: +3.29%
52W High: ₹83.07
52W Low: ₹63.92
Annual Volatility: 27.7%
Check EQUITASBNK Trade Fees →

Key Metrics Comparison Table

MetricPARACABLESEQUITASBNKEdge / Winner
Current Market Price (CMP) ₹55.85 ₹66.02 —
1-Year Price Return +44.76% +3.29% PARACABLES (41.47% higher)
52-Week High ₹74.13 ₹83.07 —
52-Week Low ₹36.75 ₹63.92 —
30-Day Annualized Volatility 45.82% 27.7% EQUITASBNK (Steadier)
30-Day Average Daily Volume 1,862,630 1,696,172 PARACABLES (Higher Liquidity)
Statutory Cost to Trade ₹1 Lakh ₹118.50 ₹118.50 Identical statutory tariff

Frequently Asked Questions

Between PARACABLES and EQUITASBNK, which stock gave better returns over the last year?

PARACABLES has outperformed EQUITASBNK over the past 12 months with a gain of 44.76% compared to 3.29%.

Which stock is less volatile: PARACABLES or EQUITASBNK?

EQUITASBNK demonstrated lower price volatility (27.7% annualized) compared to PARACABLES (45.82%). Lower volatility generally indicates steadier price action during market downturns.

What is the statutory cost to buy ₹1,00,000 of PARACABLES vs EQUITASBNK?

Statutory exchange and government charges (STT, NSE turnover fees, SEBI fee, Stamp duty, and GST) are identical for delivery purchases of equal rupee value across both stocks, totaling approximately ₹118.50 on discount brokers offering zero delivery brokerage (like Zerodha or Dhan).

Are PARACABLES and EQUITASBNK direct sector competitors?

Yes, both companies operate within the Cross-Sector Peers sector in India and are actively tracked as sector peers by institutional and retail market participants.