PATANJALI vs MPIMANIPAL: Stock Comparison

Head-to-head financial and trading comparison between Patanjali Foods Limited (PATANJALI) and Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions Limited (MPIMANIPAL) in the Cross-Sector Peers sector.

PATANJALI

NSE: PATANJALI
Patanjali Foods Limited
₹360.45
1Y Return: -21.58%
52W High: ₹472.10
52W Low: ₹336.15
Annual Volatility: 42.6%
Check PATANJALI Trade Fees →

MPIMANIPAL

NSE: MPIMANIPAL
Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions Limited
₹362.00
1Y Return: +4.88%
52W High: ₹417.40
52W Low: ₹336.60
Annual Volatility: 72.13%
Check MPIMANIPAL Trade Fees →

Key Metrics Comparison Table

MetricPATANJALIMPIMANIPALEdge / Winner
Current Market Price (CMP) ₹360.45 ₹362.00 —
1-Year Price Return -21.58% +4.88% MPIMANIPAL (26.46% higher)
52-Week High ₹472.10 ₹417.40 —
52-Week Low ₹336.15 ₹336.60 —
30-Day Annualized Volatility 42.6% 72.13% PATANJALI (Steadier)
30-Day Average Daily Volume 4,701,115 3,151,694 PATANJALI (Higher Liquidity)
Statutory Cost to Trade ₹1 Lakh ₹118.50 ₹118.50 Identical statutory tariff

Frequently Asked Questions

Between PATANJALI and MPIMANIPAL, which stock gave better returns over the last year?

MPIMANIPAL has outperformed PATANJALI over the past 12 months with a gain of 4.88% compared to -21.58%.

Which stock is less volatile: PATANJALI or MPIMANIPAL?

PATANJALI demonstrated lower price volatility (42.6% annualized) compared to MPIMANIPAL (72.13%). Lower volatility generally indicates steadier price action during market downturns.

What is the statutory cost to buy ₹1,00,000 of PATANJALI vs MPIMANIPAL?

Statutory exchange and government charges (STT, NSE turnover fees, SEBI fee, Stamp duty, and GST) are identical for delivery purchases of equal rupee value across both stocks, totaling approximately ₹118.50 on discount brokers offering zero delivery brokerage (like Zerodha or Dhan).

Are PATANJALI and MPIMANIPAL direct sector competitors?

Yes, both companies operate within the Cross-Sector Peers sector in India and are actively tracked as sector peers by institutional and retail market participants.