TURTLEMINT vs CORDELIA: Stock Comparison

Head-to-head financial and trading comparison between Turtlemint Fintech Solutions Limited (TURTLEMINT) and Waterways Leisure Tourism Limited (CORDELIA) in the Cross-Sector Peers sector.

TURTLEMINT

NSE: TURTLEMINT
Turtlemint Fintech Solutions Limited
₹68.31
1Y Return: -49.54%
52W High: ₹153.64
52W Low: ₹68.04
Annual Volatility: 91.73%
Check TURTLEMINT Trade Fees →

CORDELIA

NSE: CORDELIA
Waterways Leisure Tourism Limited
₹100.98
1Y Return: -84.89%
52W High: ₹1,043.60
52W Low: ₹100.83
Annual Volatility: 45.17%
Check CORDELIA Trade Fees →

Key Metrics Comparison Table

MetricTURTLEMINTCORDELIAEdge / Winner
Current Market Price (CMP) ₹68.31 ₹100.98 —
1-Year Price Return -49.54% -84.89% TURTLEMINT (35.35% higher)
52-Week High ₹153.64 ₹1,043.60 —
52-Week Low ₹68.04 ₹100.83 —
30-Day Annualized Volatility 91.73% 45.17% CORDELIA (Steadier)
30-Day Average Daily Volume 2,200,182 1,818,669 TURTLEMINT (Higher Liquidity)
Statutory Cost to Trade ₹1 Lakh ₹118.50 ₹118.50 Identical statutory tariff

Frequently Asked Questions

Between TURTLEMINT and CORDELIA, which stock gave better returns over the last year?

TURTLEMINT has outperformed CORDELIA over the past 12 months with a gain of -49.54% compared to -84.89%.

Which stock is less volatile: TURTLEMINT or CORDELIA?

CORDELIA demonstrated lower price volatility (45.17% annualized) compared to TURTLEMINT (91.73%). Lower volatility generally indicates steadier price action during market downturns.

What is the statutory cost to buy ₹1,00,000 of TURTLEMINT vs CORDELIA?

Statutory exchange and government charges (STT, NSE turnover fees, SEBI fee, Stamp duty, and GST) are identical for delivery purchases of equal rupee value across both stocks, totaling approximately ₹118.50 on discount brokers offering zero delivery brokerage (like Zerodha or Dhan).

Are TURTLEMINT and CORDELIA direct sector competitors?

Yes, both companies operate within the Cross-Sector Peers sector in India and are actively tracked as sector peers by institutional and retail market participants.